what's webhard?
Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud should be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.

Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.

Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It includes a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.

Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for a few selected sound sources. The next cloud only needs to be in a folder.

You should share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there exists a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, which is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It's far better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it's the only cloud that may play sound sources in an environment much like MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It has a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, in case a picture is contained in a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's in that state, you must find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you focus on can continue being reflected in the cloud instantly. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to interact with other Google services such as Gmail.

Unless you upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file does not account for cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.

There are probably the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a small pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.

If you use Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, but it is still crude in comparison to office programs applied to computers.Could it be obvious?)


Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world when it comes to media reading.

There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.



The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that can be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.

The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

p2p 순위 Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There exists a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected in real time when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. To be able to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped over the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to talk about data conveniently with little use of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on some type of computer than listen to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.